If you’ve ever tried to turn your creative work into income online, you probably know that nagging feeling—“Is this even worth it?” Been there myself, staring at all those platform choices, trying to figure out if the fees would just swallow up the money I earned. Honestly, some platforms do let you keep more of your income than others, and knowing this ahead of time can save you a lot of frustration.
Patreon can take up to 12% in fees, while Ko-fi often lets you keep nearly everything, especially with one-time donations. That’s a pretty big difference when you’re counting every dollar. Both platforms offer memberships and perks, but how they handle fees, payouts, and flexibility can really shape your long-term growth.
You want to know which option actually leaves more money in your pocket. That’s what we’re digging into here—real details for creators, minus the hype.
Key Takeaways
Choosing between Patreon and Ko-fi? It mostly comes down to how much of your money you actually keep. Each platform takes a cut, but they do it in their own way—and the details really matter if you’re trying to avoid surprise costs.
Patreon uses a tiered commission model. Depending on your plan, they take 5% to 12% of your monthly income.
That’s right off the top, before you see a dime. If you’re pulling in steady support, those fees can add up fast.
Ko-fi keeps it simple. For one-time donations, Ko-fi charges 0%—you keep all of it (except for payment processor fees, but more on that in a sec).
For subscriptions or memberships, Ko-fi takes a flat 5%. If you upgrade to Ko-fi Gold, you can even get rid of that fee.
If you want things straightforward, Ko-fi’s flat structure is easier to handle. Patreon’s tiered system gives you more features, but you’re paying for them, whether you use them or not.
You can’t avoid payment processor fees, no matter which platform you pick. PayPal or Stripe usually charge about 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction (though it varies by country). But each platform handles these fees differently.
Patreon automatically takes processor fees out of every pledge. You don’t get a say. Plus, their commission fee applies to the total amount, so you’re getting hit twice before you see your payout.
Ko-fi gives you some choices. You can either cover the processor fees yourself or let your supporters pay them. It might seem minor, but on a tight budget, every bit helps.
This is where things really split. Patreon is built for recurring subscriptions.
Supporters commit monthly, and you deliver perks or content. It’s steady, but the fees are higher and, well, a bit complicated.
Ko-fi started as a one-off donation platform, and that’s still its sweet spot. You can accept quick tips without locking anyone into a subscription. Those one-time payments come with 0% platform fees, so only the processor takes a slice.
For subscriptions, Ko-fi charges 5%, which is less than Patreon’s usual 8%+. Plus, Ko-fi lets you sell digital products, commissions, or merch right on your page—Patreon can’t quite match that. If you like mixing one-off support with recurring memberships, Ko-fi usually lets you keep more.
If your crowd likes to drop quick tips, Ko-fi’s friendlier. If you want a built-out membership community with lots of perks and structure, maybe Patreon’s higher fees are worth it.
Platform fees hit creators differently, depending on your work and your audience. Some live on small one-time tips, others need steady recurring income. The fee structures play out in their own ways for each group.
Artists and illustrators often get paid through one-off commissions, digital downloads, or casual tips. Ko-fi’s 0% fee on one-time donations really stands out here.
You keep almost all of it, minus the payment processor’s share. That’s huge if you’re selling lower-priced sketches or digital prints.
Patreon leans heavily on memberships. For visual artists, that can feel limiting unless you’re putting out regular content—like tutorials or behind-the-scenes stuff. Patreon’s fees start around 8% and can go higher, which can eat away at your profits if your supporters only chip in a few bucks each.
I’ve chatted with illustrators who stick with Ko-fi because it’s also a shop page and commission hub. You get donations, commissions, and a store all in one spot—no juggling. If your workflow is more project-based than monthly, Ko-fi usually costs you less.
Podcasters and musicians usually depend on recurring support. A podcast listener or music fan might pay a monthly fee for bonus episodes, early releases, or private streams. Patreon’s tier system is built for this, giving you tools to reward fans at different levels.
Those tiers come with a price, though. Patreon’s percentage-based fees mean the more supporters you have, the more you lose to fees. Sometimes, the recurring income outweighs the fees, but it’s still something to keep an eye on.
Ko-fi works if you lean more on tips or want to sell digital albums, sheet music, or merch. Plus, with instant payouts on Ko-fi, you get your money right away. For musicians covering studio or gear costs, that quick cash flow can matter.
Writers and bloggers often have both casual readers and diehard fans. Some just want to toss you a coffee for a good post, others want ongoing access to essays or stories. Ko-fi’s flexibility is great here—you can take one-off tips, run memberships, and sell eBooks or courses all from one page.
Patreon still works if your writing is serialized or ongoing. Think of a blogger with premium weekly posts or a novelist releasing chapters monthly. The subscription model keeps money coming in, but you’ve got to deliver or risk losing patrons.
From my own experience, it’s about commitment. If you prefer publishing at your own pace, Ko-fi’s lighter fees and “no strings attached” donations are way less stressful. But if you’re routine-driven and can promise regular content, Patreon’s setup gives you more predictable income, even with the higher fees.
See Related: Best Freelance Websites & Companies
Deciding between Patreon and Ko-fi? It really comes down to how you want to set up your income streams. Each platform gives you ways to structure memberships, reward loyal fans, and sell extras like digital downloads or commissions.
On Patreon, you set up membership tiers—maybe $3, $10, $25—and attach perks to each. Supporters pay monthly, so your revenue is predictable. Patreon takes a cut (5% to 12% depending on your plan), so keep that in mind when pricing your tiers.
Ko-fi lets you offer memberships, too, but it’s more relaxed and doesn’t push you to post on a schedule. Ko-fi charges a flat 5% on membership sales, unless you go Gold for $6/month, which drops the fee to zero. That’s worth it if you expect regular support.
If you don’t want the pressure of constant content drops, Ko-fi’s lighter approach may suit you better. But if you enjoy building a structured community, Patreon’s tier system gives you more engagement tools.
Patreon really shines with exclusive content. You can lock posts, videos, or podcasts so only paying patrons see them. There are extras like private chats and community spaces, which help you connect with your audience.
Ko-fi lets you share exclusive posts, too, but it’s simpler. Paying members can get behind-the-scenes updates, digital files, or early releases. It’s enough for most casual creators, though not as deep as Patreon’s features.
Think about how much you want to interact with your supporters. If you’re building a “fan club” with frequent updates, Patreon’s got more tools. But if you just want to share a few extras now and then, Ko-fi keeps it simple and hassle-free.
Here’s where things get interesting. Patreon focuses on memberships, so selling stand-alone items isn’t its thing. You can bundle digital goods as rewards for certain tiers, but it’s not set up for one-off sales.
Ko-fi includes a full Ko-fi Shop. You can sell ebooks, art, music, or templates directly—no subscription needed. It’s great if you want to mix donations, memberships, and product sales all in one spot.
I’ve seen plenty of creators use Ko-fi for commissions or small digital downloads, while still offering memberships. It’s flexible and doesn’t box you into one model. Patreon is better if recurring income is your main goal, but Ko-fi opens up more ways to monetize without tying everything to monthly payments.
When you compare Patreon and Ko-fi, the biggest differences show up in how they handle donations and long-term funding. Whether it’s one-off tips, recurring subs, or crowdfunding goals, the way money moves affects how steady your income feels—and how much flexibility your fans have.
Ko-fi really shines if you want to keep things casual. Supporters can send you one-time donations without making an account or locking themselves into a monthly plan. That makes it easy for someone who just found your work to toss you a few bucks on impulse.
Patreon isn’t built for one-off support. It’s all about ongoing patronage. Sure, people can join for a month and then bail, but it’s not quite as frictionless as Ko-fi.
If you’re a creator who sells small things—like art commissions or digital downloads—this flexibility is a big deal. Ko-fi lets you bundle donations, shop sales, and commissions together, so you don’t have to push people into subscriptions. Ko-fi’s donation setup also skips platform fees on one-off tips, which is huge if you rely on spontaneous support.
Subscriptions are where Patreon takes the lead. The whole platform revolves around tiered memberships—you reward fans with extra content, early access, or behind-the-scenes stuff. This model works best if you’re making ongoing things like podcasts, video series, or serialized writing.
Ko-fi offers memberships, too, but they’re more relaxed. You can set up recurring support at different price points, but there’s less focus on complicated reward tiers. That’s honestly a relief if you don’t want to juggle lots of exclusive perks.
Patreon gives you more tools for building a subscription-based community, while Ko-fi keeps things lighter. If you want a steady, predictable income, Patreon’s subscription system might fit better. But if you’d rather skip the pressure of constant rewards, Ko-fi’s approach feels easier to manage.
Both platforms let you set crowdfunding goals, but they frame them differently. On Ko-fi, you can make simple progress bars for things like new equipment, project funding, or covering monthly expenses. Supporters see what you’re aiming for and can chip in directly—even with one-off donations.
Patreon’s goals work more like milestones. When you hit a certain number of patrons or income, you unlock something new for your community. It’s less about funding a specific project and more about encouraging ongoing support.
Ko-fi’s crowdfunding feels more like traditional project-based funding, while Patreon’s is about long-term engagement. If you want to rally people around a single project, Ko-fi makes that easy. Patreon is better if your main goal is to grow your membership base over time.
See Related: Freelancing Tips: Hacks to Improve Your Freelance Work
When you’re sizing up Patreon versus Ko-fi, how each platform handles payments can really affect your bottom line. It comes down to which processors they use, how fast you get paid, and how clearly they show you the fees.
Both Patreon and Ko-fi use PayPal and Stripe to move money between you and your supporters. You’re looking at the same basic transaction fees: usually around 2.9% + $0.30 per payment in the U.S.
On Ko-fi, you link your PayPal or Stripe account directly. Supporters’ money goes straight to you, minus the processor’s cut. Ko-fi doesn’t skim off one-time donations, which is a big deal if you rely on tips or small buys.
Patreon collects payments for you and then passes them along. That setup helps with recurring memberships, but you’re hit with both platform fees and processor fees. According to this breakdown, Patreon’s cut ranges from 5% to 12% depending on your plan, and that’s before PayPal or Stripe charges.
If you want more control and fewer middlemen, Ko-fi feels lighter. Patreon automates more, but at a higher cost.
Getting your money quickly can be a game-changer. Ko-fi lets you withdraw funds almost instantly since they land right in your PayPal or Stripe account. No waiting for Ko-fi to process a payout batch.
Patreon moves slower. They process payments monthly, and you can request a payout once your balance clears. Depending on your bank or PayPal, it might take a few business days. If you count on Patreon income for bills, that lag can sting a bit.
Personally, I like Ko-fi’s “money in hand right away” approach—it’s less stressful. Patreon’s monthly cycle works if you want predictable paydays. It really depends on how you budget and what feels easier for you.
One of the biggest differences is how clearly each platform lays out the costs. Ko-fi is upfront: one-time donations have 0% platform fees, memberships have a 5% fee, or you can pay for Ko-fi Gold ($6–8/month) to drop even that. You still pay PayPal or Stripe’s standard charges.
Patreon’s fee structure is more layered. You’ve got the platform fee (5–12%), then the processor fee, and possibly currency conversion and payout fees. As one fee calculator points out, a $5 pledge often nets you closer to $4.55 after processing, and that’s before Patreon’s platform fee comes out.
If you like simplicity, Ko-fi takes the cake. Patreon has more tools, but the fee breakdown can feel like peeling an onion—there’s always another layer. If you skip the fine print, you might be surprised by how much you actually keep.
Choosing between Patreon and Ko-fi isn’t just about fees. How each platform handles customization, data tracking, and community features can really shape how smoothly you run your creator business.
Ko-fi gives you more freedom to make your page feel personal. You can add a cover image, tweak colors (if you’re on Ko-fi Gold), and set up a shop for digital or physical stuff. It’s straightforward and doesn’t overwhelm you with options.
Patreon keeps customization limited. You can upload a profile image, banner, and description, but the structure stays locked in. The focus is more on the membership tiers you build, not the look of your page.
I find Ko-fi easier to set up quickly, especially if you don’t want to fuss over design. Patreon takes more time because you’re expected to build out tiers and benefits. If you want more flexibility, Ko-fi just feels lighter.
Patreon gives you built-in analytics for tracking patron growth, impressions, and earnings. It’s not super advanced, but it covers the basics. You can spot trends and see what’s working without leaving the platform.
Ko-fi’s analytics stay basic unless you upgrade to Ko-fi Gold, which lets you connect Google Analytics. That’s handy if you like digging into bounce rates, clicks, and traffic sources.
For integrations, Patreon is pretty closed. Ko-fi plays nicer with outside tools.
I’ve seen creators hook Ko-fi up to Zapier to automate things like thank-you emails or mailing list updates. If you love automation, Ko-fi gives you more control.
If you’re a streamer, Ko-fi’s got a clear edge. It offers stream alerts that pop up when someone donates or buys something, so you can shout out supporters in real time. That alone makes it a favorite for Twitch and YouTube creators.
Patreon doesn’t have native alerts, though sometimes you can hack something together with third-party tools. Instead, Patreon leans into community features—you get comments, DMs, and chats that help keep patrons engaged inside the platform.
Ko-fi includes a Creator Academy with guides and tips, which is pretty helpful if you’re new to monetizing. Patreon doesn’t really offer that kind of built-in education. If you like learning as you go, Ko-fi gives you a bit more hand-holding.
See Related: Success Tips For Toptal Freelancers
Patreon and Ko-fi both help you earn money from your audience, but the way they handle fees can really change what you actually take home. The structure of each platform affects everything from one-time tips to long-term memberships.
Patreon uses a tiered system where you pay a percentage of your monthly income depending on your plan. That cut ranges from 5% to 12%, not counting payment processing.
Ko-fi doesn’t take a platform fee on one-time donations. If you upgrade to Ko-fi Gold, you pay a flat monthly rate instead of a percentage, which can be better if you’re earning regularly.
With Patreon, the more you make, the more the fee stings. If you bring in $1,000 a month, Patreon might take between $50 and $120, plus processing fees.
Ko-fi’s model means you keep nearly the full amount on tips and commissions, which is a huge win if your income is smaller or unpredictable.
If you rely on one-off support, Ko-fi usually leaves more in your pocket. That’s why so many illustrators and smaller creators stick with it.
But if you’re building a recurring membership program with structured perks, Patreon offers stronger tools—even if the fees are higher.
Ko-fi charges standard payment processing fees, but no platform cut on donations. If you go with Ko-fi Gold, you pay a flat $6 a month, which can be cheaper than percentage-based fees once your income grows.
Patreon adds both platform fees and processing fees, so the total cut is higher. Some creators see 10–15% of their earnings disappear after all the fees stack up.
Honestly, the quickest way is just to grab your average monthly earnings and do the math yourself. Take your Patreon income, multiply it by their fee percentage, toss in the processing costs, and see what you’re left with.
With Ko-fi, you’ve got to decide if you’ll stick with the free version or spring for Ko-fi Gold. If you’re pulling in a few hundred bucks or more each month, Gold usually makes sense—but hey, it depends on your situation.
Want to dig deeper? There are some solid breakdowns out there, like this Patreon vs Ko-fi guide for musicians or this Ko-fi vs Patreon fee analysis that really get into the nitty-gritty if you’re into that sort of thing.
Last updated: September 23, 2025
